Joseph Richard Redner v. Charles S. Dean, Sheriff of Citrus County, Florida, Robert A. Butterworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that similar ordinance failed to provide adequate safeguards where administrative hearing was scheduled \as soon as Board's calendar will allow.\
• holding that a forty-five day restraint is reasonable, and expressing agreement with other federal courts that have found time periods as long as ninety days to be reasonable
• holding also that the ordinance failed to provide for prompt judicial review
• explaining that “[w]e cannot depend on the individuals responsible for enforcing [a regulation] to do so in a manner that cures it of constitutional infirmities” and concluding that the law “risks the suppression of protected expression for an indefinite time period prior to any action”
• explaining that “[w]e cannot depend on the individuals responsible for enforcing [a regulation] to do so in a manner that cures it of constitutional infirmities” and concluding that the law “risks the suppression of protected expression for an indefinite time period prior to any action”
• discussing Cent. Fla. Nuclear Freeze Campaign v. Walsh, 774 F.2d 1515 (11th Cir. 1985); Miami Herald Publ’g Co. v. City of Hallandale, 734 F.2d 666, 675-76 (11th Cir. 1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).