Joseph Raymond Murphy v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state was acting as a market participant in its statutory scheme of giving in-state scrap processors preferential treatment
• holding that a state was acting as a market participant in its statutory scheme of giving in-state scrap processors preferential treatment
• holding that a state was acting as a market participant in its statutory scheme of giving in-state scrap processors preferential treatment
• recognizing that states acting as market participants rather than market regulators are not subject to the constraints of the Commerce Clause
• recognizing that states acting as market participants rather than market regulators are not subject to the constraints of the Commerce Clause
• holding that a state or municipality is outside the purview of the' dormant Commerce Clause — and thus may tilt in favor of local businesses — when it enters a market as a participant rather than as a regulator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).