Skip to main content
· 11/23/1981

Joseph R. Palino v. Edwin T. Casey

Citations

  • 664 F.2d 854
  • 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2169
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15760

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether trustees’ conduct breached their fiduciary duties depends on whether their actions were “arbitrary and capricious in light of the trustees’ responsibilities to all potential beneficiaries.”
  • changes in eligibility requirements and notice to employees subject to limits of “fundamental fairness”, i.e., whether notice provided employees with opportunity to develop other options

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bownes, Breyer, Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.