Joseph R. Campbell v. Rainbow City, Alabama

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “different treatment of dissimilarly situated persons does not violate the equal protection clause”
• explaining that a class of one suit cannot be maintained when similar burdens have been imposed on other individuals
• explaining that a class of one suit cannot be maintained when similar burdens have been imposed on other individuals
• “Different treatment of dissimilarly situated persons does not violate the equal protection clause.” (quoting E&T Realty v. Strickland, 830 F.2d 1107, 1109 (11th Cir. 1987))
• “The Equal Protection Clause requires government entities to treat similarly situated people alike.”
• “[T]he Equal Protection Clause requires government entities to treat similarly situated people alike.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).