Skip to main content
· 10/18/1991

Joseph Paskvan v. City of Cleveland Civil Service Commission Mitchel J. Brown Howard E. Rudolph and George v. Voinovich, Mayor, City of Cleveland

Citations

  • 946 F.2d 1233
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24751
  • 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,047
  • 1991 WL 208254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “there is no substantive due process right involved in [the plaintiff police officer’s] claim of failure to carry out a purported understanding about promotion procedures[]”
  • `The [Rule 12(c)] motion is granted when no material issue of fact exists and the party making the motion is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'
  • “We conclude that there is no substantive due process right involved in this claim of failure to carry out a purported understanding about promotion procedures.”
  • although city had discretion regarding promotion, plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to make procedural due process claim by arguing that city had waived its discretion through its practices
  • although city had discretion regarding promotion, plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to make procedural due process claim by arguing that city had waived its discretion through its practices
  • “Courts apply the same standard for Rule 12(c) motions as for Rule 12(b)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith, Boggs, Wellford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.