· 10/18/1991
Joseph Paskvan v. City of Cleveland Civil Service Commission Mitchel J. Brown Howard E. Rudolph and George v. Voinovich, Mayor, City of Cleveland
Citations
- 946 F.2d 1233
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24751
- 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,047
- 1991 WL 208254
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “there is no substantive due process right involved in [the plaintiff police officer’s] claim of failure to carry out a purported understanding about promotion procedures[]”
- `The [Rule 12(c)] motion is granted when no material issue of fact exists and the party making the motion is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'
- “We conclude that there is no substantive due process right involved in this claim of failure to carry out a purported understanding about promotion procedures.”
- although city had discretion regarding promotion, plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to make procedural due process claim by arguing that city had waived its discretion through its practices
- although city had discretion regarding promotion, plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to make procedural due process claim by arguing that city had waived its discretion through its practices
- “Courts apply the same standard for Rule 12(c) motions as for Rule 12(b)(6
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keith, Boggs, Wellford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.