Joseph P. Caulfield & Associates, Inc. v. Litho Productions, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• enforcing a comparable local rule where the appellant failed to comply with the rule in the district court and in her submission to the court of appeals
• witness’s deposition and affidavit testimony were on issues where he “plainly lacked personal knowledge,” and were thus too speculative to raise triable issues of fact
• Affidavit testimony “that was necessarily speculative and lacking in foundation ... is insufficient.”
• Affidavit testimony “that was necessarily speculative and lacking in foundation ... is insufficient.”
• district court properly ignored rebuttal “evidence” based on speculation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).