Joseph Morgan v. Bernie Aispuro, Superintendent Attorney General of the State of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where a procedure is not inherently prejudicial “the state does not have to justify its decision” to employ that procedure
• holding that where a procedure is not inherently prejudicial “the state does not have to justify its decision” to employ that procedure
• when defense counsel refused the opportunity to limit the implication that the security measures taken at trial were extraordinary, the petitioner could not use that decision to argue impermissible jury inferences
• when defense counsel refused the opportunity to limit the implication that the security measures taken at trial were extraordinary, the petitioner could not use that decision to argue impermissible jury inferences
• proceedings moved to high security courtroom in middle of trial
• high security courtroom is not prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).