Joseph Michael White v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proceeding where the plaintiff planned to market a product that it would “be able to manufacture relatively quickly”
• employing parallel test of “reasonable apprehension and immediate intention and ability”
• sufficient that although the plaintiff “had not yet advertised or solicited orders for its proposed new product,” there was significant evidence that the plaintiff intended to manufacture it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).