Joseph Mendoza and Vanessa Acosta v. Rachel Laney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the “limited context” in which this Court encouraged alternate sentences
• “[T]he district court was entitled to consider relevant conduct that was not admitted by [defendant] in determining an appropriate sentencing decision.”
• when assessing a challenge to the district court’s application of the Guidelines, this court reviews factual findings for clear error and legal conclusions de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).