Skip to main content
· 1/22/1957

Joseph M. Brule v. United States

Citations

  • 240 F.2d 589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that § 2255 cannot be used to 17 challenge sufficiency of evidence to convict
  • finding that § 2255 cannot be used to challenge sufficiency of evidence to convict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephens, Fee, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.