Skip to main content
· 1/9/2002

Joseph L. Howard v. City of Beavercreek

Citations

  • 276 F.3d 802
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 252
  • 2002 WL 21687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he concept of necessity requires at a minimum the showing that the desired accommodation will affirmatively enhance a disabled plaintiff’s quality of life by ameliorating the effects of the disability.”
  • “In sum, because Howard failed to present sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the variance he requested was a necessary accommodation under § 3604(f)(3)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Siler, Batchelder, Hood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.