Joseph J. Peppers v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an employer need not “reallocate essential job functions” or take action that “would require other employees to work harder” (citation omitted)
• noting that “an accommodation that would require other employees to work harder is unreasonable”
• discussing the interactive process as part of a reasonable accommodation claim and stating that “an employee cannot base a reasonable accommodation claim solely on the allegation that the employer failed to engage in an interactive process”
• affirming application of equitable tolling to ADA's 90 day filing requirement
• “[T]he ADA does not require an employer to reallocate essential job functions or assign an employee permanent light duty.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]he ADA does not require an employer to reallocate essential job functions or assign an employee ‘permanent light duty.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).