Skip to main content
· 7/10/1979

Joseph J. Hayes v. New England Millwork Distributors, Inc.

Citations

  • 602 F.2d 15
  • 101 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2853
  • 52 A.L.R. Fed. 582
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Hayes court found prejudice when “the amended charge was ‘not contemplated by the original complaint’”
  • “[C]ourts may not deny an amendment solely because of delay and without consideration of the prejudice to the opposing party.”
  • \[I]t is clear that 'undue delay' can be the basis for denial.\
  • \[I]t is clear that 'undue delay' can be a basis for denial.\
  • \undue delay\ can be a basis for denying leave to amend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffin, Campbell, Bownes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.