· 7/10/1979
Joseph J. Hayes v. New England Millwork Distributors, Inc.
Citations
- 602 F.2d 15
- 101 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2853
- 52 A.L.R. Fed. 582
- 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13301
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the Hayes court found prejudice when “the amended charge was ‘not contemplated by the original complaint’”
- “[C]ourts may not deny an amendment solely because of delay and without consideration of the prejudice to the opposing party.”
- \[I]t is clear that 'undue delay' can be the basis for denial.\
- \[I]t is clear that 'undue delay' can be a basis for denial.\
- \undue delay\ can be a basis for denying leave to amend
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffin, Campbell, Bownes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.