Joseph H. Reeves v. Wilson Floor and Wallcovering, Inc. (Appeal from Autauga Circuit Court: CV-17-900124).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that officers are not required to refrain from stops when activity could be innocently explained and stating that Terry standard does not require officers to determine if the defendant’s acts “can be construed as innocent through speculation”
• \The facts before the agents ... adequately justified the initial inquiry.... The slight intrusion of this encounter was supported by the [defendants'] evasive actions in the airport ....\
• \The facts before the agents ... adequately justified the initial inquiry.... The slight intrusion of this encounter was supported by the [defendants'] evasive actions in the airport....\
• “The facts before the agents ... adequately justified the initial inquiry.... The slight intrusion of this encounter was supported by the [defendants’] evasive actions in the airport .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).