Joseph EKELAND, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting work evaluation showed Ekeland performed poorly in all job skill areas and concluded that he could not be rehabilitated for any kind of competitive gainful employment
• “This court often has held that testimony elicited by hypothetical questions that do not relate with precision all of a claimant’s impairments cannot constitute substantial evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).