Joseph E. Suggs v. State of Tennessee
Syllabus
The Petitioner, Joseph E. Suggs, acting pro se, appeals from the summary dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus by the Davidson County Criminal Court, claiming his judgments of conviction for rape of a child are void because they lack the required file-stamp. After review, we affirm the judgment of the habeas corpus court.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- investor would have been happy with either 6% dividend return plus 10% growth in retained earnings; a 20% growth in shareholders’ equity; or a capital appreciation factor in excess of 30%
- same for employees who worked 65-70 hours per week
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Camille R. McMullen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.