Joseph E. Simanonok v. Germaine B. Simanonok

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing that Supreme Court precedent 9 indicates that Sec. 1408 should not be read as permitting suits for damages
• explaining the distinctions between the two types of analyses (citing Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 (1946))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).