Skip to main content
· 1/23/1950

Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents

Citations

  • 180 F.2d 26
  • 84 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 180
  • 86 U.S. App. D.C. 100
  • 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 4171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “To give appellant a monopoly, through the issuance of a patent, upon so great an area .. . would in our view impose without warrant of law a serious restraint upon the advance of science and industry”
  • method of focus-group testing for beverages is not patentable subject matter
  • “To give appellant a monopoly, through the issuance of a patent, upon so great an area . . . would in our view impose without warrant of law a serious restraint upon the advance of science and industry”
  • method of focus-group testing for beverages is not patentable subject matter
  • method of focus-group testing for beverages is not patentable subject matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Prettyman, Washington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.