Skip to main content
· 11/13/2003

Federal Case

Citations

  • 348 F.3d 1143
  • 12 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 913
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9799
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that mere error or negligence by the government official is insufficient to \satisfy the `affirmative misconduct' requirement\
  • stating that mere error or negligence by the government official is insufficient to “satisfy the ‘affirmative misconduct’ requirement”
  • treating district court’s order as “practically final” where postponement of briefed, argued, and potentially dispositive issue would not promote judicial economy
  • local Department agents \cannot bind the government beyond the scope of the statute granting them authority\
  • local Department agents “cannot bind the government beyond the scope of the statute granting them authority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.