Joseph Duris v. Erato Shipping, Incorporated Japan Line Limited Regent Botan Shipping, Inc. Pallas Shipping Agency, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that not imputing the contacts of a predecessor to a successor for purposes of personal jurisdiction “would allow corporations to immunize themselves by formalistically changing their titles”
• permitting successor jurisdiction following merger noting \[a]ny other ruling would allow corporations to immunize themselves by formalistically changing their titles\
• \Any other ruling would allow corporations to immunize themselves by formalistically changing their titles.\
• “Any other ruling would allow corporations to immunize themselves by formalistically changing their titles.”
• “if [plaintiff] can establish [the predecessor company’s] Ohio contacts sufficient to gain [personal] jurisdiction over [predecessor company], he may thereby gain jurisdiction over [the defendant successor company].”
• “[a]ny other ruling would allow corporations to immunize themselves by formalistically changing their titles.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).