Joseph DIORIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that error was harmless where it did not impact result of the step being challenged
• holding that the complained-of error was harmless because it' did not have an impact on the step being challenged
• holding that the complained-of error was harmless because it did not have an impact on the step being challenged
• holding that the complained-of error was harmless because it did not have an impact on the step being challenged
• holding that the complained- of error was harmless because it did not have an impact on the step being challenged
• holding that the assigned error was harmless because it did not have an impact on the step being challenged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).