Skip to main content
· 6/12/1987

Joseph D. Wolgel and Edythe R. Wolgel v. Mexicana Airlines, a Mexican Corporation

Citations

  • 821 F.2d 442
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8033

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the drafters of the Convention did not intend the word ‘delay’ in Article 19 to extend to claims . . . that arise from the total nonperformance of a contract’”
  • “We conclude that the Wolgels’ claim falls outside the Warsaw Convention .... ”
  • where airline refused to transport plaintiffs and did not offer alternative transport, the Montreal Convention did not preempt plaintiffs’ state law claims because it did not apply to nonperformance
  • where airline refused to transport plaintiffs and did not offer alternative transport, the Montreal Convention did not preempt plaintiffs’ state law claims because it did not apply to nonperformance
  • interpreting parallel provision in Warsaw Convention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Flaum, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.