· 8/10/1998
Joseph Corrao v. United States
Citations
- 152 F.3d 188
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 18356
- 1998 WL 461944
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a district court must transfer uncertified second or successive habeas petitions to the appropriate court of appeals
- holding that an application is second or successive when a prior motion was adjudicated on the merits
- noting that a district court must transfer uncertified second or successive habeas petitions to the Court of Appeals for certification
- vacating dismissal of conviction based on second or successive petition because defendant had not first obtained permission to file from the Court of Appeals
- “[R]eaching the merits of an uncertified second or successive . . . petition impermissibly circumvents the AEDPA’s gatekeeping provisions.”
- claims of inadequate medical treatment are not cognizable in a habeas proceed-mg
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Winter, McLaughlin, Shadur
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.