Skip to main content
· 8/10/1998

Joseph Corrao v. United States

Citations

  • 152 F.3d 188
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 18356
  • 1998 WL 461944

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court must transfer uncertified second or successive habeas petitions to the appropriate court of appeals
  • holding that an application is second or successive when a prior motion was adjudicated on the merits
  • noting that a district court must transfer uncertified second or successive habeas petitions to the Court of Appeals for certification
  • vacating dismissal of conviction based on second or successive petition because defendant had not first obtained permission to file from the Court of Appeals
  • “[R]eaching the merits of an uncertified second or successive . . . petition impermissibly circumvents the AEDPA’s gatekeeping provisions.”
  • claims of inadequate medical treatment are not cognizable in a habeas proceed-mg

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, McLaughlin, Shadur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.