Joseph Chapman v. State of Arkansas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• further holding Washington’s ban on assisted suicide was rationally related to several legitimate state interests
• only rights that are “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition” count as fundamental
• “[W]e apply the fundamental-rights approach when the plaintiff challenges legislative action.”
• no due process right to assisted suicide
• considering role of mental health

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).