Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. David Stockman, Director, Office of Management and Budget

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Back Pay Act is “‘derivative,’” in that it only authorizes payment of back pay where another statute or regulation required payment, and the payment did not occur (quoting United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d 882, 887 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (en banc
• holding that the Back Pay Act is “ ‘derivative,’ ” in that it only authorizes payment of back pay where another statute or regulation required payment, and the payment did not occur (quoting United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d 882, 887 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (en bmc
• “Unless some other provision of law commands payment of money to the employee for the ‘unjustified or unwarranted personnel action,’ the Back Pay Act is inapplicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).