· 9/5/2017
Joseph C. McComas II v. Mercer County Board of Education
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that plaintiffs had no property interest in a higher statutory dividend rate on Federal Re- serve stock
- concluding the plaintiff “did not plead facts sufficient to establish the government’s intent to contract”
- examining background principles of law to determine whether the plaintiff’s property interest derived from statute or contract
- affirming 12(b)(6) dismissal where plaintiff failed to “allege facts establishing the existence of a contract with the government”
- affirming dismissal of contract claim because plaintiff failed to adequately plead a necessary element
- examining statutory language for evidence of Gov- ernment’s intent to contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.