Skip to main content
· 7/24/1980

Joseph B. Williams and Leo Bazile v. Joseph L. Alioto

Citations

  • 625 F.2d 845
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 15441

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where plaintiffs obtained some relief before case became moot, on appeal, attorney fees were 5790 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL v. MARINA POINT DEVELOPMENT proper
  • holding that plaintiffs were prevailing parties because the preliminary injunction gave them the precise relief sought — preventing the defendant police officers from continuing to stop and frisk any black male who had certain physical characteristics
  • plaintiff who obtained preliminary injunction was “prevailing party” under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, even though action was subsequently dismissed as moot
  • same, where police voluntarily ceased enjoined conduct while preliminary injunction on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Kennedy, Hug

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.