Joseph A. Seedman v. United States District Court For The Central District Of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that once a district court certifies a remand order based on § 1447(c), “it is divested of jurisdiction and can take no further action on the case”
• holding a district court lacks jurisdiction 20 where a defendant’s second petition for removal is based on the same grounds as the prior 21 removal
• holding a court could not vacate its 15 | prior erroneous remand order because the successive removal was based on the same grounds as 16 | the first and therefore was not reviewable
• holding a court could not vacate its 15 | prior erroneous remand order because the successive removal was based on the same grounds as 16 | the first and therefore was not reviewable
• “Once a district court certifies a remand order to state court [on section 1447(c) grounds] it is divested of jurisdiction and can take no further action on the case.”
• \Once a district court certifies a remand order to state court [on section 1447(c) grounds] it is divested of jurisdiction and can take no further action on the case.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).