Joselito Vitug v. Multistate Tax Commission, Dan R. Bucks, as Executive Director, Les Koenig, as Director of Audit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Demonstrating that an interview process is influenced by subjective factors does not go any distance toward proving that [the plaintiffs protected characteristics] were among those subjective factors.”
• stating an No. 21-2746 37 employer’s hiring for four positions presented a “sample size” that was “too small for any meaningful statistical com- parison”
• affirming summary judgment against Title VII disparate-impact claim where plaintiff failed to provide sufficient statistical evidence to show the challenged employment action had a negative ef- fect on minority job applicants
• affirming summary judgment against Title VII disparate-impact claim where plaintiff failed to provide sufficient statistical evidence to show the challenged employment action had a negative ef- fect on minority job applicants
• plaintiff established a prima facie case by showing that he was a qualified Filipino Catholic and that promotion went to \a non-Filipino and born-again Christian\
• constructive discharge claim as a result of discrimination based on plaintiff’s religion and national origin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).