Josefina Gonzalez, and Cross-Appellees v. St. Margaret's House Housing Development Fund Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Jefferson Parish as “foeus[ing] primarily on the anticompet-itive effect of tying arrangements and the resultant harm to consumer choice in the tied-product market,” and not on “the tying entity’s interest”
• interpreting Jefferson Parish as “focus[ing] primarily on the anticompetitive effect of tying arrangements and the resultant harm to consumer choice in the tied‐product market,” and not on “the tying entity’s interest”
• anticompetitive effects is distinct element of per se claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).