Josef T. Appelhans, Jr. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “excess leave personnel,” such as the plaintiff, “can obtain free health care at military facilities”
• finding Feres applicable to servicemember on excess leave pending discharge because “his injury occurred as a result of medical treatment by military doctors . . . conclusively demonstrat[ing] that that injury was ‘incident to service’”
• “The fact that [plaintiffs] injury occurred as a result of medical treatment by military doctors ... conclusively demonstrates that that injury was ‘incident to service.’ ”
• “The majority of decisions in this and other circuits, especially since Johnson, have held that medical treatment at military facilities is ‘incident to service.’ ”
• Most courts “have held that medical treatment at military facilities is 'incident to service.’ ”
• Most courts “have held that medical treatment at military facilities is ‘incident to service.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).