Jose Zumel v. Loretta E. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘We review agency factual findings and determinations of mixed questions of law and fact for substantial evidence,’ and legal questions de novo.”
• “‘We review agency factual findings and determinations of mixed questions of law and fact for substantial evidence,’ and legal questions de novo.”
• “[T]he BIA may not make its own findings or ‘rely on its own interpretation of the facts.’” (citation omitted)
• “[T]he BIA may review an IJ’s factual findings only to determine whether the findings are clearly erroneous . . . [T]he BIA may not make its own findings or rely on its own interpretation of the facts.”
• “The BIA’s failure to evaluate the factual findings of the IJ that were key to the IJ’s holding, indicates the BIA was not reviewing the IJ’s determination for clear error.” (citation and quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).