JOSE SANZ v. MYRIAM SAENZ

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that challenging a special condition as “necessarily more restrictive than is called for under the[] circumstances” is a substantive unreasonableness argument (emphasis omitted)
• finding that, “in the absence of any showing” of a “sufficiently onerous burden” on the supervisee’s liberty, the “self- evident rationale” supported a special condition requiring him to bear the costs of his computer monitoring restrictions
• finding justification for computer monitoring condition procedurally reasonable despite “brusque and generalized explanation”
• “[I]n the context of the broader monitoring regime ordered by the court . . . [such] decisions are properly understood as matters of detail.”
• “The court was under no obligation to . . . pick through every condition and explain, point-by- point, how each was responsive to the offending conduct.”
• “We do not suggest that such a severe restraint on internet access could never be warranted, 8 but rather that it would require particularized justification by the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).