Jose N. Briseno v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the fact that an alien is “potentially susceptible to being deported” does not establish that the defendant was “deportable”
• holding that Webster did not apply where petitioner did not raise col- 3 Compare Dotson v. Griesa, 398 F.3d 156, 179 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding that equitable claims are precluded by the CSRA even if the plaintiff has no other remedy
• acknowledging that a petitioner's status as an alien is a \jurisdictional fact\
• “The policy decision to deport aliens who have committed certain crimes is for Congress to make; we will not intervene as long as 2 17-72686 procedural due process requirements have been met.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).