Jose Macias v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a court must “accept[] as true all material factual allegations of the complaint” on a facial challenge to standing
• holding that “[a] defendant’s conduct that injures a plaintiff but does so only indirectly, after intervening conduct by another person, may suffice for Article III standing”
• holding that “[a] defendant’s conduct that injures a plaintiff but does so only indirectly, after intervening conduct by another person, may suffice for Article III standing’’
• holding that “[a] defendant’s conduct that injures a plaintiff but does so only indirectly, after intervening conduct by another person, may suffice for Article III standing”
• holding that there was not a showing of minimal diversity when the complaint alleged that a defendant LLC was “a citizen of a different state” without specifying which state
• holding that an allegation as to the “principal place of business” of a limited liability company is insufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction because it does not allege “the identity or citizenship of [the company’s] members.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).