Jose MacEdo v. F/v Paul & Michelle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that collective bargaining agreements are “highly approved generally” and that enforcing their limitations on maintenance is “quite different” from' enforcing limitations negotiated by “an individual seaman”
• holding that an agreed-upon maintenance rate in a CBA should be enforced
• “A union representing fisherman who, when they are ashore, are at home and not adrift at some foreign port, might recognize this circumstance and prefer to emphasize [a different contractual benefit]”
• “A union representing fisherman who, when they are ashore, are at home and not adrift at some foreign port, might recognize this circumstance and prefer to emphasize [a different contractual benefit]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).