Jose Luz Preciado v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a statute did not violate the Establishment Clause because the statute properly limited the state aid to secular functions of religious schools
• involving a program giving “direct cash reimbursement” to religious schools for performing certain state-mandated tasks
• involving a program giving \direct cash reimbursement\ to religious schools for performing certain state-mandated tasks
• describing as \minimal\ the chance that religious bias would enter process of grading state-drafted tests in secular subjects, given \complete\ state safeguards
• describing as “minimal” the chance that religious bias would enter process of grading state-drafted tests in secular subjects, given “complete” state safeguards
• permitting public subsidy for certain routinized recordkeeping and testing services performed by nonpublic schools but required by state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).