Jose Luis Yanez-Popp v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, American Immigration Lawyers Association, Amicus Curiae

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Board of Immigration Appeals “does not violate the Full Faith and Credit clause of the Constitution by not construing ‘conviction’ as do the Maryland courts”
• finding that a grant of “probation without judgment” under Maryland law, during which time the court had the power to enter a judgment or adjudication of guilt without further proceedings upon a violation of probation, met the Ozkok standard for conviction
• following the general proposition in Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, 460 U.S. 103 (1983
• explaining that this proposition from Dickerson remains good law
• following the general proposition in Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, 460 U.S. 103 (1983
• “[N]owhere in the [Pino ] decision did the Court disapprove of the First Circuit’s statement that ‘conviction’ was to be defined according to federal [and] not state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).