Skip to main content
· 7/24/2003

Jose Jurado, Jr. v. Sherry Burt

Citations

  • 337 F.3d 638
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14735
  • 2003 WL 21714592

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[a]bsent compelling equitable considerations, a court should not extend limitations by even a single day.”
  • holding that “[a]bsent compelling equitable considerations, a court should not extend limitations by even a single day.”
  • holding that “[a]bsent compelling equitable considerations, a court should not extend limitations by even a single day.”
  • holding that “[a]bsent compelling equitable considerations, a court should not extend limitations by even a single day”
  • holding that “[a]bsent compelling equitable considerations, a court should not extend limitations by even a single day.”
  • holding that “[a]bsent compelling equitable considerations, a court should not extend limitations by even a single day.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Gibbons, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.