Jose J. Roman v. United States Postal Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the consideration of a collective bargaining agreement and affidavit stating that a search of USPS records found no record of plaintiff filing a grievance required treating the motion to dismiss as one for summary judgment
• acknowledging the Postal Reorganization Act’s contractual exhaustion requirement, but treating failure to exhaust as a merits issue, rather than as a jurisdictional one
• affirming district court's dismissal of plaintiff's due process claim against the Postal Service because plaintiff's rights were protected by the collective-bargaining agreement governing his employment
• “This prop- erty interest is created by the collective bargaining agree- ment …, which provides that no employee shall be disci- plined or discharged ‘without just cause.’”
• “This prop- erty interest is created by the collective bargaining agree- ment …, which provides that no employee shall be disci- plined or discharged ‘without just cause.’”
• “This property interest is created by the collective bar- gaining agreement between the Postal Service and the Union, which provides that no employee shall be disciplined or dis- charged ‘without just cause.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).