Jose J. Loera, Jr. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that collateral estoppel applies outside of double jeopardy as a common-law principle—as “very much a common law subject” (internal quotation marks omitted
• holding order granting uncontested motion to exclude evidence at trial was not law of the case because nonopposition was based on understanding that evidence would not be used at trial
• \... collateral estoppel is applicable in a criminal proceeding without reference to the double jeopardy clause.\
• “collateral estoppel is applicable in a criminal proceeding without reference to the double jeopardy clause”
• “[T]here is no indication that . . . evidence favorable to his defense had become stale.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).