· 2/23/2004
Jose Garcia v. Village of Mount Prospect, Mount Prospect Police Pension Board, and George Steiner
Citations
- 360 F.3d 630
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 3226
- 93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 446
- 2004 WL 324903
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that “the practical difficulties of exhaustion will not prevent res judicata from applying”
- holding that a village board was in privity with its agent.
- noting that Illinois case law on this topic “has been consistent for certain types of claims, but rather confusing for others”
- explaining that the IHRA provides for an administrative body to adjudicate civil rights claims, and for judicial review of that body’s final orders within a certain time
- explaining that exhaustion under the IHRA is required and failure to exhaust warrants dismissal
- holding village to be in privity with police pension board due to agency relationship
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Ripple, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.