Skip to main content
· 2/23/2004

Jose Garcia v. Village of Mount Prospect, Mount Prospect Police Pension Board, and George Steiner

Citations

  • 360 F.3d 630
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 3226
  • 93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 446
  • 2004 WL 324903

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that “the practical difficulties of exhaustion will not prevent res judicata from applying”
  • holding that a village board was in privity with its agent.
  • noting that Illinois case law on this topic “has been consistent for certain types of claims, but rather confusing for others”
  • explaining that the IHRA provides for an administrative body to adjudicate civil rights claims, and for judicial review of that body’s final orders within a certain time
  • explaining that exhaustion under the IHRA is required and failure to exhaust warrants dismissal
  • holding village to be in privity with police pension board due to agency relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Ripple, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.