Jose Erasmo Crespo v. Bill Armontrout

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing a state appellate court’s acknowledgment of a state trial court’s implicit finding of fact, and stating, “This holding leaves no doubt that the court rejected [the petitioner’s] factual contention that he asserted his right to counsel.”
• officer's explanation of the warnings alleged to be misleading
• officer’s explanation of the warnings alleged to be misleading

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).