Ninth Circuit· 3/20/2019

Jose Duran-Rodriguez v. William Barr

Citations

918 F.3d 1025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that threats by phone and in person, without accompanying acts of violence, did not compel finding past persecution
holding that threats over the course of two days by phone and in person, without acts of violence, did not compel finding past persecution
holding that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s determination of no past persecution where the petitioner was threatened by armed cartel members but was not harmed
holding that two death threats did not compel a determination that petitioner had suffered past persecution
holding that threats by phone and in person, without accompanying acts of violence, did not compel finding past persecution
holding that threats alone “constitute persecution in only a small category of cases,” typically where the threats are “repeated, specific and combined with confrontation or other mistreatment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.