Jose Davila v. USA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a plaintiff seeking jurisdictional discovery is only “entitled to [that] discovery if the record shows that the requested discovery is . . . likely to produce the facts needed to withstand a Rule 12(b)(1
• stating that a plaintiff seeking jurisdictional discovery is only “entitled to [that] discovery if the record shows that the requested discovery is . . . likely to produce the facts needed to withstand a Rule 12(b)(1
• refusing discovery because the plaintiff' failed to allege any “well-pleaded facts or evidence to refute the government’s assertion ... that no [nondiscretionary] policy exists”
• finding a protective sweep constitutional when the suspects where handcuffed and kneeling on the ground throughout it
• finding § 2680(c) did not apply because the detention of goods had ceased before the alleged tortious conduct took place
• finding a protective sweep justified because the rangers “had reasonable suspicion that a fleeing felon might . . . have weapons in the vehicle”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).