Jose Contreras v. Ted Schiltgen, District Director Immigration and Naturalization Service United States Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of an alien’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and holding that he “may not collaterally attack his state court conviction in a habeas proceeding against the INS”
• “drug conviction is considered final and a basis for deportation when appellate review of the judgment—not including collateral attacks'—has become final”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).