Jose BARRERA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “evidence, properly offered and clearly relevant for impeachment purposes, was improperly excluded simply because, under the collateral source rule, it would have been inadmissible as direct evidence”
• “OSHA does not create duties between employers and invitees, only between employers and their employees”
• “OSHA does not create duties between employers and invitees, only between employers and their employees.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).