· 6/6/1990
Jose A. Soto v. United States Postal Service
Citations
- 905 F.2d 537
- 16 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1356
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9086
- 53 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,984
- 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1162
- 1990 WL 73902
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding, in a Title VII action against the United States Postal Service, that “[a] district court should dismiss claims brought against all other defendants, including the U.S. Postal Service and the local postmaster”
- “In cases brought against the Postal Service, the Postmaster General is the only properly named defendant. A district court should dismiss claims brought against all other defendants, including the U.S. Postal Service and the local postmaster.”
- “In cases brought against the Postal Service, the Postmaster General is the only properly named defendant. A district court should dismiss claims brought against all other defendants, including the U.S. Postal Service and the local postmaster.” (internal citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selya, Cyr, Rosenn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.