Skip to main content
· 6/6/1990

Jose A. Soto v. United States Postal Service

Citations

  • 905 F.2d 537
  • 16 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1356
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9086
  • 53 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,984
  • 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1162
  • 1990 WL 73902

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in a Title VII action against the United States Postal Service, that “[a] district court should dismiss claims brought against all other defendants, including the U.S. Postal Service and the local postmaster”
  • “In cases brought against the Postal Service, the Postmaster General is the only properly named defendant. A district court should dismiss claims brought against all other defendants, including the U.S. Postal Service and the local postmaster.”
  • “In cases brought against the Postal Service, the Postmaster General is the only properly named defendant. A district court should dismiss claims brought against all other defendants, including the U.S. Postal Service and the local postmaster.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Cyr, Rosenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.