Jose A. Martinez v. The State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plaintiff with diabetes was not disabled where he treated his diabetes with insulin and other medications
• “In construing the NFEPA, Nebraska courts have looked to federal decisions, because the NFEPA is patterned after Title VII.”
• superseded by statute in non-relevant part as stated in Maday v. Dooley, 4:17-CV-04168-KES, 2019 WL 4935705, at (D.S.D. Mar. 8, 2019)
• “[A] diabetic is not per se disabled but must demonstrate his condition substantially limits one or more major life activities”
• “We consider a newly raised argument only if it is purely legal and requires no additional factual development, or if a manifest injustice would otherwise result.”
• “We consider a newly raised argument only if it is purely legal and requires no additional factual development, or if a manifest injustice would otherwise result.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).