Jorling v. United States Department of Energy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Court of Appeals has generally “weigh[ed] the defendant’s interests in the availability of a statute of limitations defense with the need to correct an injustice”
• explaining that the remedy must be reasonable and not arbitrary
• “[I]n each case, the legislature’s revival of the plaintiff’s claims for a limited period of time was reasonable in light of th[e] injustice.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).